We live in chaotic times.
When it comes to reading fiction, do stressed-out people want an escape from reality to ease their minds? Do they want to see themselves represented on the page? vicariously live out the worst case scenario? fly to fairyland?
Many writers try to tap in to the zeitgeist to give readers what they want. And that’s good if it means they want to use their writing to help people. Or, you know, write books that’ll actually get read.
The problem is, by the time they find out (and write) “what readers want,” those same readers want something different.
Artists walk the line between understanding readers’ desires and staying true to the stories they need to tell. These aren’t always at odds with one another, but sometimes they are.
So, when push comes to shove, what’s a writer to choose?
Well, you hear different things. But, at the end of the day, I believe writers tell the best stories when they go with their gut. Which is to say, I won’t be writing about zombies or post-Apocalyptic worlds any time soon, not because those kinds of stories are beneath me, but because I’m just not interested in them.
And if I’m not interested in my stories, how can I expect anyone else to be?
What do you think? Should writers be concerned, first and foremost, with what they think readers want?